home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: loki.tor.hookup.net!news
- From: Rajendra_Singh@msn.com (Rajendra Singh)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.os.msdos.programer,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc
- Subject: Re: fastest code
- Date: Thu, 04 Apr 1996 06:02:46 GMT
- Organization: HookUp Communication Corporation, Oakville, Ontario, CANADA
- Message-ID: <4jve0c$chn@loki.tor.hookup.net>
- References: <316112A2.7D37@public.sta.net.cn> <NFS9dJAHgWYxEwdO@chrism.demon.co.uk>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: u36u400.tor.hookup.net
- NNTP-Posting-User: u36u400
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- Chris Marriott <chris@chrism.demon.co.uk> wrote:
-
- >I've heard it said that Watcom have the best compiler in terms of code
- >speed. What they do NOT have is a particularly good development
- >environment - VC++ is the clear winner in that department.
-
- I too have heard this about Watcom, and I've used it extensively under
- OS/2. I actually heard a rumour that IBM used Watcom's compiler to
- compile their C/Set++ for OS/2 ...
-
- ---
- Rajendra Singh, B. Sc. (Rajendra_Singh@msn.com)
- "What is understood need not be discussed." - Loren Adams
-
-